English 4, Post 3, 'Themed Free Post - Carrer Related [hopefully]'

 Warm Salutations,


Prospective Biochemists, Chemists and Food Engineers and Pharmaceutical Chemists from FCQF,



This week, I am bringing to you the third out of eight blog sessions.



In this particular session, you will be asked to do the following class assignment:



Comments: Leave a comment on your teacher’s entry + 3 of your classmates' posts
Word Count: 180 words
You are free to write any topic [related to your study program] you want to, in any manner. 



As usual, I will leave you a sample. This time an extract from a literature essay that I and a classmate wrote a few years ago,


"The Scarlet Letter as a biformous narrative: Characterization.


Hawthorne’s novel, ‘The Scarlet Letter’ can be said, inhabits ‘biformity’, a term which has been coined by Michael Kammen in his essay ‘Biformity: A Frame of Reference’. More particularly, the novel’s ‘biformity’ can be found in the construction of one of its main characters, Hester Prynne.


As a starting point, ‘Biformity’ can be shaped as an ambivalent state of two opposing philosophical and moral forces that, “Subject people to more extreme contrasts and abrupt changes during a lifetime or a generation than is normally the case with other great nations” (Kammen, 101) Moreover, ‘biformity’, is said to develop “a tension between newer and older human ways of acting and believing”. (Kammen, 99)


‘Biformity’ can also be explained through the creation of a national identity, a creation of a collided and contradictory identity, which furthers back in time to the creation of the Puritan collective. America`s first settlers are said to be contradictory as well, or, as a better term can encompass, America’s first settlers might possibly have lived in a ‘biformity’, or, as Kammen points out, to have lived in ‘extreme contrasts and abrupt changes during a lifetime’ (Kammen, 101).


Such are the contrasts that the national American character proposes, that ‘biformity’ falls into a further conceptualization concerned with its historical and philosophical implications, as Leo Marx points out: “The dialectical tendency of mind – the habit of seeing life as a collision of radical opposed forces and values – has been accentuated by certain special conditions of experience in America”. (Kammen, 107)

                                                                                                                                 

         The character of the American people, according to Marx, is said to have a dialectical tendency to see the conformation of life as a radical collision of opposing forces. The reality for American people is dialectical, in constant contradiction, and within this apparent struggle of opposing forces, the national character of America emerges". (...) 



References


Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter. Wordsworth Editions Limited. 1992.


Hawthorne, Nathaniel. The Scarlet Letter: An authoritative text. Essays in Criticism and Scholarship, Third Edition. WW Norton and Company. 2005


Kammen, Michael. People of Paradox: An Inquiry Concerning the Origins of American Civilization. Knopf, New York. 1972.


Eliade, Mircea. The Sacred and The Profane: The Nature of Religion. Harcourt, Inc. 1957.

 


Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I have never read this book but I find interesting the topics that is dealing with

    ReplyDelete
  3. ( Anaís Reitter) I think it is really interesting to see the two points of view

    ReplyDelete
  4. nice essay, I like this sample of this.

    ReplyDelete
  5. (Ana Araya): omg, it's very interesting :o

    ReplyDelete
  6. (José Vásquez Reyes) Hello Teacher! I had never heard the term "biformity" before. You learn something new every day. Good essay!

    ReplyDelete
  7. the term "biformity" is very interesting

    ReplyDelete
  8. I never hear that word and is curiosly

    ReplyDelete
  9. very good essay, too interesting

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't think I've ever heard the word biformity before, how interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I like books that combine philosophy and morality.

    ReplyDelete
  12. To be honest, I´m not sure i understand the essay quite right, but it looks interesting anyway!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hello, I have never heard the term biformity:))

    ReplyDelete
  14. Although for me, these topics are difficult to understand, they sound quite interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  15. (Tamara Figueroa) I had never heard of this book, but it sounds very philosophical.

    ReplyDelete
  16. (Sebastián Astudillo) How sad is the habit of see life as a collision of radical opposed forces, because I think it only leads to life full of conflict and war

    ReplyDelete
  17. (carlos gonzález) very good essay, very well written

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

English 4, Post 7, 'Changes to my study programme'

English 4, Post 5, 'My future job'

English 4, Post 4, 'Themed Free Post [II]'